This morning, I'm grateful for the poetry of Gerard Manley Hopkins with his sounds and sights of splendid splotches of imagination and visualization in poems such as "Pied Beauty":
My first encounter with Hopkins was in a college course with Dr. Gilbert Findlay at CSU, a professor who I am also grateful for, for so many reasons. Dr. Findlay's frequent go-to approach to poetry was to "stick the poem in your ear," reading it dramatically with his animated Scottish accent, and to further challenge us to "take this poem and look at it," and to often look at it again, and again. The rhythms of close reading, reader-response discussions, and more independent close reading challenges did much to coach my attention span and appreciation of poetry, poetic craft, and various and sundry poets.
Reading the start of The ABCs of Reading, published in 1934, one might recognize the influence on Findlay by the poet Ezra Pound. By analogy, Pound promotes a similar method of reading via his account of biologist Louis Agassiz's approach to teaching students to closely examine biology specimens, in this case a sunfish. In the account, a student comes to Agassiz to learn how to master biology. The student expects much more direct coaching and guidance; however, each day, for several days, Agassiz simply directs him to look closely at the fish, leaving him for over an hour to do so and record what he notices. From that process of training his attention and his metacognition (reflectively thinking about his noticing and thinking over time), the student learns much more than the teacher could have directly conveyed. Perhaps we all need to take time to practice this method in our distracted age. At the risk of being a little reductionistic, there's also a good case to be made, with the help of neuroscience, about how this sort of attention training can develop some high-quality, healthy dopamine experiences.
Under Findlay's tutelage, I eventually caught myself hearing and savoring the poetry and sounds of poets like John Keats and Gerard Manley Hopkins. Incidentally, several experts on reading assert that we don't actually need many strategies or techniques to learn to read well, we mostly need lots of experience reading a lot of things over time.
Late this summer, I pulled out my copy of Hopkins' poetry and took some time to stick his poems in my ears, experiencing the ricocheting rhythms and tongue-twisting tactics of the poet as I worked at reading his poems aloud--actually, a lot more like play than work. I then discovered that The Rabbit Room just started a "Rhyme & Reason" podcast series with Hopkins' poetry as the first theme for the series on poets this year. In many of the podcasts, the presenter shares the poem ("sticks it in our ears"), provides some brief biographical and conceptual contexts for the poem, shares a thoughtful and accessible mix of explication (unfolding), and then another speaker shares another well-presented reading of the poem.
As a side note on musical sounds, the brilliant neuroscientist and neurophilosopher Ian McGilchrist speculates that our earliest development of language as a species was likely first in the form of musical sounds. (See his excellent book The Master and His Emissary.) That seems to fit well with much of the sonic beauty and compactness of Hopkins' poetry.
I'm fascinated by the world of stress sounds in language in general and poetry in particular. Hopkins' innovative tinkering and tossing about of sounds was too much for most of his contemporaries, and it took several decades after his death for other artists and readers to embrace his work. Along those lines, I'm grateful for the long-suffering efforts of his friend Robert Bridges to promote Hopkins' poetry.
There are many other goodies to be found in Hopkins' poetry, including his poetic theory of "inscape" and "instress", as well as an embedded sense of spiritual exercises that fit well with contemporary concerns about mental health and well-being. I'm reluctant to focus too much on the psychology of this latter part, lest Hopkins' poetry gets hijacked by therapeutic concerns and other hang-ups about its potential usefulness. For me, at least, Hopkins if far more about the surprising wonder we can discover and rediscover about everyday things and places. In one of many instances, I find a moment of this call in his conclusion to "Penmaen Pool":
Then come who pine for peace or pleasure
Away from counter, court, or school,
Spend here your measure of time and treasure
And taste the treats of Penmaen Pool.
So many persons, things, and sounds to be grateful for in a world that is crammed with inscaped pleasures available for those with eyes to see and ears to hear...